<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Maybe Don&#8217;t Adapt a Property If You Don&#8217;t Actually Like the Property	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/</link>
	<description>Brian Cronin takes a look at interesting pieces of pop culture history from the worlds of TV, film, music and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Fraser		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-14733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-14733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding Poirot, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s any stranger than setting Holmes in the Victorian era when Doyle wrote stories set all the way up to the start of WW I. They were both contemporary characters then but now they&#039;re period pieces]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Poirot, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s any stranger than setting Holmes in the Victorian era when Doyle wrote stories set all the way up to the start of WW I. They were both contemporary characters then but now they&#8217;re period pieces</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Duggy		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-12034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-12034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Corollary: Don&#039;t write a film about, say, fighting alien bugs or an escaped robot and then decide it&#039;s similar to existing property, buy that property, change some names and claim it&#039;s a &quot;Starship Troopers&quot; film or a &quot;I, Robot&quot; film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corollary: Don&#8217;t write a film about, say, fighting alien bugs or an escaped robot and then decide it&#8217;s similar to existing property, buy that property, change some names and claim it&#8217;s a &#8220;Starship Troopers&#8221; film or a &#8220;I, Robot&#8221; film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Drew		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-11065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-11065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PS, great essay and couldn&#039;t agree more-- if &quot;show creators&quot; want to adapt source material, there should be some built-in commitment to fidelity to that material. Taking a title and character names isn&#039;t adaptation; it&#039;s harder than that. Maybe that&#039;s why some don&#039;t bother to try.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, great essay and couldn&#8217;t agree more&#8211; if &#8220;show creators&#8221; want to adapt source material, there should be some built-in commitment to fidelity to that material. Taking a title and character names isn&#8217;t adaptation; it&#8217;s harder than that. Maybe that&#8217;s why some don&#8217;t bother to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Drew		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-11064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-11064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The short answer is that Perry Mason (and the others) are recognizable properties, IP with some threadbare nostalgia clinging to them, and the showrunners really don&#039;t care what fans remember of the original. They&#039;re just out to exploit the name rather than invent &quot;Larry Shmason, Persecutor of the Innocent&quot; or what have you. It&#039;s an easier sell to lazy, unimaginative studio execs when there&#039;s an actual brand attached... and fans who don&#039;t like the &quot;new and degraded&quot; version probably aren&#039;t your target audience anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is that Perry Mason (and the others) are recognizable properties, IP with some threadbare nostalgia clinging to them, and the showrunners really don&#8217;t care what fans remember of the original. They&#8217;re just out to exploit the name rather than invent &#8220;Larry Shmason, Persecutor of the Innocent&#8221; or what have you. It&#8217;s an easier sell to lazy, unimaginative studio execs when there&#8217;s an actual brand attached&#8230; and fans who don&#8217;t like the &#8220;new and degraded&#8221; version probably aren&#8217;t your target audience anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Pendergast		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-10365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Pendergast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 03:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-10365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CC: The Producers of Catwoman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC: The Producers of Catwoman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John King		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-10362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 20:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-10362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[just imagine if someone revived Mission Impossible but started off with their intricate plan (of the type the TV series was known for) going completely wrong and the team dying, and after that, not trying to emulate the TV series and, worse, making a regular character from the TV series into a bad guy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just imagine if someone revived Mission Impossible but started off with their intricate plan (of the type the TV series was known for) going completely wrong and the team dying, and after that, not trying to emulate the TV series and, worse, making a regular character from the TV series into a bad guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nato		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-10329</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 02:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-10329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well written and well thought out piece. 
I would add that HBO seemed to take its inspiration from the books, which are grittier and contain more peril than the saccharine Burr TV series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written and well thought out piece.<br />
I would add that HBO seemed to take its inspiration from the books, which are grittier and contain more peril than the saccharine Burr TV series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fraser		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-10327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 23:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-10327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Multiple thoughts:
1)It&#039;s true Ollie didn&#039;t call himself Green Arrow in ARROW but he&#039;s still Oliver Queen, running around and using a bow and arrow to fight crime. 
2)This is a common problem with adapting kid stories: what if a charming setting like Oz or Wonderland were DARK AND EVIL? Ooooh! That&#039;s been done for at least forty years now, but creators still think it&#039;s edgy and new.
3)In the case of Perry Mason, I wonder if part of the issue is that &quot;heroic defense attorney&quot; isn&#039;t a thing in TV much any more. The hero attorneys are all prosecutors.
4)In response to Dave: the thing is, the Burr series wasn&#039;t that different from the books (though book-Perry didn&#039;t extract confessions on the stand in most of them). It&#039;s not like HBO was trying to get back to the original roots of the character — they&#039;re ignoring the source material too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple thoughts:<br />
1)It&#8217;s true Ollie didn&#8217;t call himself Green Arrow in ARROW but he&#8217;s still Oliver Queen, running around and using a bow and arrow to fight crime.<br />
2)This is a common problem with adapting kid stories: what if a charming setting like Oz or Wonderland were DARK AND EVIL? Ooooh! That&#8217;s been done for at least forty years now, but creators still think it&#8217;s edgy and new.<br />
3)In the case of Perry Mason, I wonder if part of the issue is that &#8220;heroic defense attorney&#8221; isn&#8217;t a thing in TV much any more. The hero attorneys are all prosecutors.<br />
4)In response to Dave: the thing is, the Burr series wasn&#8217;t that different from the books (though book-Perry didn&#8217;t extract confessions on the stand in most of them). It&#8217;s not like HBO was trying to get back to the original roots of the character — they&#8217;re ignoring the source material too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Widen		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-10322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Widen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-10322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You ask &quot;why adapt a property if you don&#039;t like it,&quot; and the answer is always money.

The sheer volume of TV shows and films produced and/or directed by people who clearly hated the property is staggering. Sometimes, it turns out good. Kenneth Johnson, for instance, is far from shy from claiming he hated comic books and considered them the bottom of the barrel of entertainment; he still developed, produced, directed and/or wrote &quot;THE INCREDIBLE HULK&quot; for 5 seasons on CBS. Yet not only was it good, the MCU to this day is heavily inspired by it regarding the Hulk. Tim Burton was also not shy about &quot;not understanding or liking&quot; Batman, yet he directed 2 successful films about Batman which were both good and inspired not only an even better animated series (and related media) but also influenced the comics as well (albeit in some &quot;troubling in hindsight&quot; ways, like focusing 99% on the villains).

The CW and/or DC Comics are pretty infamous for this kind of approach. &quot;SMALLVILLE&quot; ran 10 seasons and was about Superman before he became Superman, or Superboy, or even wore a costume even though he was literally teaming up with the Justice League and/or JSA by the end. &quot;GOTHAM&quot; was 5 season of, basically, &quot;Batman without Batman,&quot; just Jim Gordon running around for years until Bruce Wayne got old enough (barely, and only if he stood on a milk crate) to put on a mask and fight crime near the end. &quot;ARROW&quot; started before Oliver Queen actually called himself, well, Green Arrow and he was just &quot;the Vigilante&quot; with mascara over his eyes for 1-2 seasons. &quot;DAREDEVIL&quot; did the same thing, only Murdock was &quot;The Devil from Hell&#039;s Kitchen&quot; for seasons. And no end of superhero films have been made by directors and/or producers who clearly have contempt for the franchise and are only doing it for alimony or cocaine. From &quot;FAN4STIC&quot; to Zack Synder&#039;s entire career after &quot;WATCHMEN&quot; to even a few of the pre-MCU Marvel movies (like &quot;DAREDEVIL,&quot; where the director very clearly wanted to remake &quot;THE CROW&quot;), and on it goes. Even 2004&#039;s &quot;THE PUNISHER&quot; is like that, with Frank Castle not wearing a skull shirt and dedicating himself to punishing criminals (rather than wanting personal and specific revenge) until a second before the credits.
But the answer is always money. For enough cash, Steven Spielberg would make a &quot;TWINKIE THE KID&quot; movie and then breathlessly proclaim that it is high art of the utmost quality that HAD to be told. Anyone would. The question is, kind of like Jay Sherman once said, if we stop watching bad remakes, maybe they&#039;ll stop making bad remakes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask &#8220;why adapt a property if you don&#8217;t like it,&#8221; and the answer is always money.</p>
<p>The sheer volume of TV shows and films produced and/or directed by people who clearly hated the property is staggering. Sometimes, it turns out good. Kenneth Johnson, for instance, is far from shy from claiming he hated comic books and considered them the bottom of the barrel of entertainment; he still developed, produced, directed and/or wrote &#8220;THE INCREDIBLE HULK&#8221; for 5 seasons on CBS. Yet not only was it good, the MCU to this day is heavily inspired by it regarding the Hulk. Tim Burton was also not shy about &#8220;not understanding or liking&#8221; Batman, yet he directed 2 successful films about Batman which were both good and inspired not only an even better animated series (and related media) but also influenced the comics as well (albeit in some &#8220;troubling in hindsight&#8221; ways, like focusing 99% on the villains).</p>
<p>The CW and/or DC Comics are pretty infamous for this kind of approach. &#8220;SMALLVILLE&#8221; ran 10 seasons and was about Superman before he became Superman, or Superboy, or even wore a costume even though he was literally teaming up with the Justice League and/or JSA by the end. &#8220;GOTHAM&#8221; was 5 season of, basically, &#8220;Batman without Batman,&#8221; just Jim Gordon running around for years until Bruce Wayne got old enough (barely, and only if he stood on a milk crate) to put on a mask and fight crime near the end. &#8220;ARROW&#8221; started before Oliver Queen actually called himself, well, Green Arrow and he was just &#8220;the Vigilante&#8221; with mascara over his eyes for 1-2 seasons. &#8220;DAREDEVIL&#8221; did the same thing, only Murdock was &#8220;The Devil from Hell&#8217;s Kitchen&#8221; for seasons. And no end of superhero films have been made by directors and/or producers who clearly have contempt for the franchise and are only doing it for alimony or cocaine. From &#8220;FAN4STIC&#8221; to Zack Synder&#8217;s entire career after &#8220;WATCHMEN&#8221; to even a few of the pre-MCU Marvel movies (like &#8220;DAREDEVIL,&#8221; where the director very clearly wanted to remake &#8220;THE CROW&#8221;), and on it goes. Even 2004&#8217;s &#8220;THE PUNISHER&#8221; is like that, with Frank Castle not wearing a skull shirt and dedicating himself to punishing criminals (rather than wanting personal and specific revenge) until a second before the credits.<br />
But the answer is always money. For enough cash, Steven Spielberg would make a &#8220;TWINKIE THE KID&#8221; movie and then breathlessly proclaim that it is high art of the utmost quality that HAD to be told. Anyone would. The question is, kind of like Jay Sherman once said, if we stop watching bad remakes, maybe they&#8217;ll stop making bad remakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Xander		</title>
		<link>https://popculturereferences.com/maybe-dont-adapt-a-property-if-you-dont-actually-like-the-property/#comment-10321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://popculturereferences.com/?p=5056#comment-10321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had this same feeling and same discussion with people after watching Rian Johnson&#039;s Star Wars movie. It felt like he knew everything that made Star Wars work, but he was contemptuous of their optimistic tone and wanted to deconstruct them.

There was one scene in the movie that felt like it was created by a different filmmaker entirely (the Force explanation scene) because it was a genuine, warm look at the lore of the universe Lucas created. The other scene that felt like a true Star Wars scene was Rose&#039;s scene where she stopped Finn&#039;s suicidal rush.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this same feeling and same discussion with people after watching Rian Johnson&#8217;s Star Wars movie. It felt like he knew everything that made Star Wars work, but he was contemptuous of their optimistic tone and wanted to deconstruct them.</p>
<p>There was one scene in the movie that felt like it was created by a different filmmaker entirely (the Force explanation scene) because it was a genuine, warm look at the lore of the universe Lucas created. The other scene that felt like a true Star Wars scene was Rose&#8217;s scene where she stopped Finn&#8217;s suicidal rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
