6 thoughts on “Did the Crew of Three’s Company Hold a ‘Funeral’ for Suzanne Somers?”

  1. Social commentary often discusses issues people face in life, such as fear, loneliness, and psychological pressure. Freddy can be seen as a symbol of the invisible fears we often try to deny. Freddy represents the feeling of being watched and powerless in the face of unseen threats.

  2. A fake funeral by the Three’s Company crew is a wild story, and the Churchill quote aside is great. TV moments like this would be perfect meme material today, and people now even turn their own photos into short clips with the Crazy Frog AI video trend.

  3. The point about the Newsweek cover being the likely source of the cast’s cooler reaction is interesting, since it frames the pay dispute as building on earlier resentment rather than starting it. One practical step when checking this kind of story: look for contemporaneous trade-press coverage from 1980 and 1981, like Variety or TV Guide archives, to see whether the funeral prank was reported at the time or only surfaced later in retellings. That timing would help separate documented events from embellished legend.

  4. The point about the producers citing DeWitt’s contract parity as a reason to limit Somers’ raise is the part worth pausing on, since it frames a pay dispute as fairness to a third party. A practical step when checking this legend: find contemporaneous trade-press coverage from 1980 or 1981 that describes the actual on-set reaction, rather than relying on later retellings, and note whether the funeral story appears in a primary source or only in Somers’ own later accounts.

  5. The point about the Newsweek cover being arranged without Ritter and DeWitt knowing until the shoot is the part that sticks with me, since it explains how a publicity decision can sour a cast long before any money talks started. A practical step for anyone reading up on this dispute: check the timeline of contract negotiations against the production calendar, because the season five start date shapes what leverage each side actually had. Doing that makes the pay-equity argument easier to judge fairly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *